Breaking down walls and building bridges: How blockchain could solve the personal finance jigsaw


Consumers have never had so many options when it comes to personal finance. Think back only five years ago and not even Monzo was on the scene. Instead, when it came to where to store your money or where to get credit, you had the choice of either a big bank or...well... another big bank. 

Like many of us, I often need a coffee to start my day. You head out onto the high street to get that caffeine hit and you have a massive choice. Independents offering an exciting blends and roasts. The big chains like Starbucks and Costa. Some offer amazing cakes.  Some offer a place to sit and socialise. Others are just holes in the wall where you can grab a coffee to go. Whatever you want from your coffee house, there are options. On a Monday you might need a quick takeaway before a meeting, on Sunday you can relax and maybe have some lunch so you go somewhere else. Different purpose, different place. 

The same principle applies when it comes to the current banking world. People go to different providers depending on what they need.

Broken Chain

On the surface of it, this sounds all well and good. Consumer choice is surely always a positive thing, and a healthy dose of competition prevents monopolies from forming. However, unfortunately our financial lives are much more complex than our morning coffee choices, and the problem is that the systems in place in our financial landscape currently simply don’t allow consumers to fully maximise the options available to them. 

You might have a savings account with one financial institution for its excellent interest rate, and then a challenger card provider (a Starling or a Monzo) for its online banking offering. And what about your credit card? That’s with a third competitor because they had a better deal. Before you know it you have a personal finance patchwork quilt, necessitating a huge amount of frustrating and time consuming administration should you wish to transfer funds between accounts (and don’t even get me started on the hassle if one of those accounts happens to be abroad!).

The reason for this is that each financial institution is walling itself off in the name of competition, meaning that there is no fluidity or flexibility between banks that would actually help the consumer. Instead of building walls, the financial world needs to be building bridges, offering its own expertise to entice customers, but being willing to work with competitors so that customers can seamlessly access another institution’s expertise in another area. And at the very centre of this brave new world being built sits blockchain technology.

Building Bridges

 I’ve talked about the role of blockchain in a world of ‘inhuman economics’ in previous blogs and how its decentralised, open and apolitical nature means it is the critical financial piece that is missing from current systems. It doesn’t care about profits or have a need to protect itself behind walls. As humans with profit-seeking motives we naturally create silos where to gain access, you need to go through a gatekeeper. But with blockchain we can form digital bridges. Digital bridges that traverse across needless emotions, conflicting motives and unnecessary frictions. By taking away the human element, and the complexities that come with human interference, it will make our choices easier.

Bringing blockchain bridges into the personal finance world would mean a platform to assist consumers to operate their financial lives more seamlessly. Imagine a world where you could move your savings or debts around, depending on which provider is offering the best rates that day. A world where anyone can access any investment opportunities, with no restrictions. A world where you can have multiple pots of capital, scattered and easily access them in one, centralised way. No paperwork, no waiting periods, no payments to yourself. No more limitations.

And all done with a swipe of your phone while having that morning coffee, be it from Starbucks or that new craft coffee house you’ve been meaning to try. Who knows, maybe it accepts bitcoin – but that’s a discussion for another day.

July 2019

InHuman Economics Part 1: Finance's Inflection Point

Andy Bryant, March 2019


The future economy will be barely recognisable to humans. Investment and economic decision-making, far from being under our control, will be so advanced in sophistication that human minds will be relegated to mere passengers in a cambrian explosion of novel, automated methods and financial forces. It will be difficult to even grasp the rules of the game. And behind everything, driving a paradigm shift unmatched in its breathtaking speed, will be legions of autonomous programs; evolving, transacting and traversing across a universe of Blockchains.

Reality Check…

Ok, so back down to earth for a second. That’s very different to what the economy looks like now. While today’s user interfaces are certainly improving, investing and transacting is still a very human and manual system. It still takes the same length of time to open a bank account as it did a century ago, and I still make some payments today that would arrive faster if I delivered a bag of cash by horseback. Nothing really happens without real people making instructions, checking instructions, approving and processing instructions, and then waiting...

In this context, my above vision of an unrecognisable automated economy seems a long way off, but I think it’s closer than most believe. Exponential take-off is often hard to spot in the moment, even if we’ve seen it happen before..

Information Explosion

According to a Cisco study, the collective sum of the world’s data will grow from 33 zettabytes in 2018 to 175 ZB by 2025. If a full, 4-drawer filing cabinet contains about 1 gigabyte of text data, that’s the equivalent today of these filing cabinets springing into existence at the same rate that espresso cups of water go over the Niagra falls. At this rate, it would take just under 2 minutes for fresh data to exceed ALL of the data that existed in the world of 1986.

One filing cabinet filled as each espresso cup of water falls

One filing cabinet filled as each espresso cup of water falls

We all know what’s changed between 1986 and today to cause the explosion of this information economy. The decentralised Internet has allowed the creation, sharing, and publishing of data and content to proliferate exponentially, without the need for centralised publisher’s approval or printing equipment. Further, beyond blogs and cat videos, an ever-increasing amount of this information is now procedurally-generated, never to be seen by human eyes but instead the prized resource for an impalpable network of algorithms and APIs emerging from the hyper-connected fabric of cyberspace. IT innovation races on, constrained only by the imagination of the architect, be it man or machine.

Back To Bankers

So if the internet is a compelling example of how decentralisation liberated and supercharged the information economy, the financial economy, by contrast, looks positively primordial.

So why haven’t we seen the same with finance?

The traditional financial system is still just like the state of information before the internet. It is centralised, and a top-down system. In top-down systems, objectives start at a  high level, and increase in complexity as that objective is broken down into smaller more manageable units. Most states, corporations, and other man-made systems are organised in this way. They’re easier for us to manage, understand and regulate, but the problem is that the scope and potential of such systems are constrained by early decisions made with limited information. Chance innovation and serendipity are less likely to occur. Actual end user feedback takes time to travel back up to the decision makers. Goals are inflexible and unresponsive to changing conditions.

Most importantly though, top-down systems naturally create silo effects. Everything is partitioned and guarded. Bankers compete with their own colleagues for bigger bonuses. Managers zealously guard their resources and reach to hit their targets even if they no longer make sense. There is little incentive to collaborate, spend time on cultivating new ideas, or spend money on connecting or automating legacy infrastructure. Walls are everywhere in the financial system, between companies but also within them. Little wonder then that in today’s financial system most things work pretty much like they did a century ago. Humans still rule, and even early efforts in algorithmic automation (e.g. trading strategies) are confined to specific sectors and shrouded in secrecy. In finance, then, people generally have got used to meaningful global innovations like ATMs or credit cards taking decades to emerge, and as a result are completely unaware of the impending explosion of exponential change that’s about to occur.

Blockchain’s Dehumanising Detonation

Changes to the status quo that require some painful reversal before moving forward in a new direction don’t happen naturally, and rarely from the top down. It’s why societies undergo revolutions, incumbent companies undergo break-ups, and financial services are still bloated with rent-seeking humans extracting value and building walls. I don’t blame the bankers or rent-seekers; it’s perfectly rational human behaviour given this existing system. But those walls are about to come down.

Blockchain is not a top down system. It doesn’t care about profits. It doesn’t need walls to protect itself. It doesn’t even really need people to work. It is decentralised, open, and apolitical. Essentially, it’s that critical financial piece we were missing; achieving for digital scarcity what the Internet achieved for digital abundance, and allowing for the transfer of value across an untrusted medium without the need for humanised financial silos. Together, these will merge to form a substrate for the emergence of a whole new economy. It will be a fully programmatic economy, compatible with automation, an economy dehumanised by A.I. . Without walls, human gatekeepers will become unnecessary. Machines will transact directly with machines. Data and predictions will be tradable assets. Economic development will be uninhibited by boardrooms or biology. And without these limitations, progress towards dehumanisation of the economy will be a detonation comparable to the Information Explosion that started in the late 20th century. The game will change, InHuman Economics will emerge, and our human needs will increasingly be only a minor parameter in the unfathomable system that emerges. Best we stick up for ourselves...

Connectors and Compounders

In this series I will try to unpack how I see this transformation unfolding. While it’s impossible to predict the exact sequence of developments, I can generally see innovations falling into two categories or dimensions, which I shall call Connectors and Compounders. Connectors will refer to ‘horizontal’ developments that level the playing field; breaking down walls and silos, bridging gaps, increasing velocity and collaboration through connectivity and interoperability. Compounders will refer to ‘vertical’ developments or layers that leverage Connectors to make impossible things possible; brand new capabilities that emerge from this substrate, enabled by the decentralised and inhuman properties of the system.

Through these Connectors and Compounders effects, I expect the pace of change towards a dehumanised economy to be rapid and unexpected. Things are already happening, and while most people focus on crypto prices the foundations of the InHuman economy are being laid.

March 2019